OSTC3, cR, sport and 2 :  heinrichs weikamp forum The fastest message board... ever.
OSTC's running hwOS 

Current Page: 1 of 1
Results 1 - 11 of 11
3 months ago
Deep_Yo
Hi Ralph, That's sounds perfect. Thanks for your work. I don't have Multideco but I think it could be a good thing to have it. Regards, Yoann
Forum: OSTC3, cR, sport and 2
3 months ago
Deep_Yo
Hi Ralph, Thank you for your answer. I also performed the planned dive on last saturday (v3.01). The calculated deco was the following one (same gas) : 15m : 1min 12m : 4 min 9m : 5 min 6m : 5 min 3m : 11min The ascent rate was around 10m/min. As you can see, it was very close to the simulated one and quite different than the v3.04. I stayed longer @3m due to difference betwee
Forum: OSTC3, cR, sport and 2
3 months ago
Deep_Yo
Hi Matthias, Can you share the files of the OSTC3 please ? Thank you per advance Yoann
Forum: OSTC3, cR, sport and 2
3 months ago
Deep_Yo
Hi Ralph, Thank you for your message. Extended stop was disable. In fact, at the first simulation, it was on and vsible on the "OC" line. It didn't change the DTR but added a stop at 10m to switch gas and removed one min at 9m. In both case, the gaz was exactly the same: air + NX80. I know, air is bad at 60m but I don't want to debate around that here Deco setting
Forum: OSTC3, cR, sport and 2
3 months ago
Deep_Yo
Hi Matthias and Ralph, Thank you for your great job. I have just installed the V3.04 and ran the simulator. The results are quite a bit confusing because I have some difference with the 3.01 (as you can see onto the attached picture). Can you explain the reason ? Thank you per advance.
Forum: OSTC3, cR, sport and 2
4 years ago
Deep_Yo
Ok. It doesn't really matters in fact. I think the question was already asked but I didn't find the answer : can you tell us more about the depth dependent speed ? Thanks. Regards
Forum: OSTC3, cR, sport and 2
4 years ago
Deep_Yo
Jak, I totally agree with you : ppO2 is so much more convenient to use than p02/P02. I think (but I could be wrong, my chemistry courses are so far behind me...), that Phosphorus-Oxygen 2 doesn't exist in that form. So it's impossible to confuse I'll let Matthias choose what's better for us Regards Yoann
Forum: OSTC3, cR, sport and 2
4 years ago
Deep_Yo
Hi Claude, I understand your point of view and if you want to be absolutely precise, we should write "PO2" and not "p02". Regards Yoann.
Forum: OSTC3, cR, sport and 2
4 years ago
Deep_Yo
ClaudeDive Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Menu D├ęco > > "Menu ppO2" = "Menu pO2" > > Simulateur > Start Simulateur > > "ppO2 = "pO2" Hi Claude, One question : why do you want to change "pp02" by "p02" ? In French, we use as in the other language "pp02" for th
Forum: OSTC3, cR, sport and 2
5 years ago
Deep_Yo
Well, You must be right. What a shame ! Sorry for that mistake.It seemed like a good idea.
Forum: OSTC3, cR, sport and 2
5 years ago
Deep_Yo
Hello, Is it possible to maximize the size of the depth on the OSTC 3 (It seems to be bigger on the Sport than the 3) ? Between 0 and 99m I sincerely believe it could improve the screen reading. After 100m, you can let it as now and if the screen size doesn't permit it (I think it's due to max depth and other informations). Thank you for considering this feature request. B
Forum: OSTC3, cR, sport and 2
Current Page: 1 of 1

This forum powered by Phorum.