Page 1 of 1

ZH16-OC Vs GF Calculations

Posted: Tuesday 29. January 2013, 18:40
by Stu @ M Developments
Hi Guys,
I am in a discussion on another forum about some of the Custom Functions on the OSTC-2n.

I thought that when using the GF algortythm, the Custom functions CF11 & CF12 played no part as they are used in the NON GF algorythm?

Can someone elaborate on how these work alongside CF's 32 & 33 please?

Re: ZH16-OC Vs GF Calculations

Posted: Tuesday 29. January 2013, 20:18
by Chilihead
if you switch from GF to Bühlmann (ZH-L16) on the OSTC you get a message like "check CF11 & CF12"

if you switch from Bühlmann (ZH-L16) to GF on the OSTC you get a message like "check CF32 & CF33"

OSTC_Custom_Functions_EN_V221.pdf

if you set CF32=100 and CF33=100 you get 100% Bühlmann (exaktly like CF11=100 & CF12=100)

the difference is:
CF32 says when decostops start
CF33 says when decostops end

CF11 says how much faster the OSTC calc the saturation processes then ZH-L16
CF12 says how much slower the OSTC calc the desaturation processes then ZH-L16

both add more safty... different ways

(hope you understood me and my english)
... little bit off-topic: Decompression myths but intresting