forum.heinrichsweikamp.com

Hi everybody,

CF25 is named "Divisor Decoplan" in Firmware 2.70. I am puzzled about the data I get in the logbook with CF25 set to 6 and sample rate set to 10 (default).

Reading the documenation about Custom Functions, CF25 is described as "Debug" and should be left to the Default Value 0.

As far as I can remember, the bytes used for "Debug" in the "Extended Info" were changed to "Decoplan" in Firmware 2.51-beta and the size changed from 9 to 15 bytes…

Matthias, what is the truth? if CF25 can be used to store the decoplan in the logbook, what is the format used?

Thanks in advance and best wishes,
--
Daniel Flipo
OSTC 2N #6131

Hi danou,

what CF documentation do you have?
The latest documentation for the CF is here.

In short words, with CF25 other than 0, the decosteps, calculated from OSTC, are stored with the profile data.
This is working, and CF25 is not used for debug anymore.
So dont worry, you can use it.

Regards
Rob

Rob Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> what CF documentation do you have?
> The latest documentation for the CF is
> [url=read.php?2,
> 8503,11827,page=2#msg-11827]here[/url].

Thanks, Rob!

I used OSTC Custom Functions FR v270.pdf and ostc_interface_description.odt dated 2013/06/16. Both still mention CF25 for "Debug".

I am also interested by the format used to store the decostops…

Best wishes,
--
Daniel Flipo
OSTC 2N #6131

Hi,

It's 15bytes with the decostop length in minutes. Starting at 3m (Or 4, 5 or 6m - depending on CF29) and ending in 45m.

It can be used to store the full decoplan in a configurable interval.

Regards,
Matthias

Hello,

The french translate for CF25 is always "Diviseur Debug" in french_text.asm

Regards,
6RiL

Ok, this will be changed to "Divis. Paliers" in the next release.

Regards,
Matthias

heinrichsweikamp Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It's 15bytes with the decostop length in minutes.
> Starting at 3m (Or 4, 5 or 6m - depending on CF29)
> and ending in 45m.

Thanks, Matthias for this clarification!

ostc_interface_description.odt should be updated accordingly

Best regards,
--
Daniel Flipo
OSTC 2N #6131

danou Wrote:
> ostc_interface_description.odt should be updated
> accordingly

Done.

Matthias