Page 1 of 1
FW version reported incorrectly in Subsurface
Posted: Monday 9. February 2015, 12:58
by jb2cool
In Subsurface i can see a tab with 'extra data'. In 3.0.2 the FW version is reported to Subsurface as 3.2
Re: FW version reported incorrectly in Subsurface
Posted: Tuesday 10. February 2015, 07:39
by glance
This was indeed a formating bug in Subsurface/libdivecomputer. I suggest you report problems with subsurface in the future on
http://trac.subsurface-divelog.org/
//Anton
Re: FW version reported incorrectly in Subsurface
Posted: Tuesday 10. February 2015, 07:44
by jb2cool
I wasn't sure if Subsurface was showing it incorrectly or whether the OSTC was outputting the wrong info. In fact I'm still not sure about that now, any way I can check? Can I perform a raw dump and examine that?
Re: FW version reported incorrectly in Subsurface
Posted: Tuesday 10. February 2015, 16:16
by jb2cool
I think Anton has isolated this as a Subsurface issue rather than a Heinrichs Weikamp issue so problem solved.
Re: FW version reported incorrectly in Subsurface
Posted: Thursday 12. February 2015, 08:00
by glance
If you would like to check for your self, you can start by reading the protocol documentation at:
https://bitbucket.org/heinrichsweikamp/ ... at=default
I would recommend against it, because its quit a bit of work.
The problem is that libdivecomputer communicated firmware versions as single integers. Subsurface tries to untangle that into a firmware version string as the one presented to users. In that code there was a small issue which now is fixed.
//Anton