Page 1 of 1
VPM(-B) - any plans ?
Posted: Tuesday 8. February 2011, 13:57
by gorcio
Just wanted to check if You guys ever thought about having VPM implemented as well in the firmware ?
Re: VPM(-B) - any plans ?
Posted: Tuesday 8. February 2011, 14:02
by seawanderer
I'd like to know about it, too!
I hope it will be implemented.
Re: VPM(-B) - any plans ?
Posted: Tuesday 8. February 2011, 21:35
by tom
And the absolute TOP would be if it could run GF and VPM in parrallel ...
Or even GF doubled, so you could set 2 different sets of parameters and then choose on the fly which profile you want to follow. This would enable you to have an emergency scenario without having to use a second computer just for that.
Re: VPM(-B) - any plans ?
Posted: Tuesday 8. February 2011, 22:47
by andrejk
tom Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> And the absolute TOP would be if it could run GF
> and VPM in parrallel ...
>
> Or even GF doubled, so you could set 2 different
> sets of parameters and then choose on the fly
> which profile you want to follow. This would
> enable you to have an emergency scenario without
> having to use a second computer just for that.
Do you think that you take full blown PC under water?

As far as I know the OSTC MK2 is not powerfull enough (procesor, RAM) to run VPM ! Not even doubled GF!
regards
Re: VPM(-B) - any plans ?
Posted: Wednesday 9. February 2011, 01:56
by wrobell
tom Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
[...]
> Or even GF doubled, so you could set 2 different
> sets of parameters and then choose on the fly
> which profile you want to follow. This would
> enable you to have an emergency scenario without
> having to use a second computer just for that.
just reconfigure your computer to always display GF,
then follow the numbers... you will get enormous
amount of GF scenarios

Re: VPM(-B) - any plans ?
Posted: Friday 11. February 2011, 22:48
by Tom
Well, I tried that in simulator mode and it puzzled me.
the value didnt seem to make sense but i'll take a good look at it again

Re: VPM(-B) - any plans ?
Posted: Friday 11. February 2011, 23:06
by Tom
Either i flipped a bit last time i checked it our or there has been a bug fixed but it does make sense now. Mighty cool.