Hi Guys,
I am in a discussion on another forum about some of the Custom Functions on the OSTC-2n.
I thought that when using the GF algortythm, the Custom functions CF11 & CF12 played no part as they are used in the NON GF algorythm?
Can someone elaborate on how these work alongside CF's 32 & 33 please?
ZH16-OC Vs GF Calculations
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Thursday 21. June 2012, 14:24
ZH16-OC Vs GF Calculations
Best Regards,
Stu
(Blackpool - UK)
Stu
(Blackpool - UK)
Re: ZH16-OC Vs GF Calculations
if you switch from GF to Bühlmann (ZH-L16) on the OSTC you get a message like "check CF11 & CF12"
if you switch from Bühlmann (ZH-L16) to GF on the OSTC you get a message like "check CF32 & CF33"
OSTC_Custom_Functions_EN_V221.pdf
if you set CF32=100 and CF33=100 you get 100% Bühlmann (exaktly like CF11=100 & CF12=100)
the difference is:
CF32 says when decostops start
CF33 says when decostops end
CF11 says how much faster the OSTC calc the saturation processes then ZH-L16
CF12 says how much slower the OSTC calc the desaturation processes then ZH-L16
both add more safty... different ways
(hope you understood me and my english)
... little bit off-topic: Decompression myths but intresting
if you switch from Bühlmann (ZH-L16) to GF on the OSTC you get a message like "check CF32 & CF33"
OSTC_Custom_Functions_EN_V221.pdf
if you set CF32=100 and CF33=100 you get 100% Bühlmann (exaktly like CF11=100 & CF12=100)
the difference is:
CF32 says when decostops start
CF33 says when decostops end
CF11 says how much faster the OSTC calc the saturation processes then ZH-L16
CF12 says how much slower the OSTC calc the desaturation processes then ZH-L16
both add more safty... different ways
(hope you understood me and my english)
... little bit off-topic: Decompression myths but intresting
rettet euch selbst