Normally I don't post new Diving Log features here, but this one could be interesting for OSTC users and I need some feedback from technical divers. I've implemented the ZH-L16 deco model into Diving Log, which allows you to simulate different parameters (GF & gas mixtures) for an existing dive profile. You can compare the results to the data recorded by the OSTC. If you want to try it, you can read more about here in my blog.
If you find any problems, please let me know. Thank you!
[img]http://www.divinglog.de/blog/wp-content/2014/03/Deco1-300x201.png[/img]
New deco calculator for Diving Log
New deco calculator for Diving Log
Diving Log 6.0 - https://www.divinglog.de/
-
- Posts: 4446
- Joined: Sunday 13. May 2007, 18:07
Re: New deco calculator for Diving Log
Hi Sven,
Nice work. Only minor differences to the OSTC implementation in total. But the beginning of the deco phase seems not to be perfect yet in Divinglog. I tested some dives without noticeable differences.
OSTC:
[img]file.php?2,file=525,filename=ostc.PNG[/img]
Divinglog:
[img]file.php?2,file=524,filename=divinglog.PNG[/img]
Regards,
Matthias
Nice work. Only minor differences to the OSTC implementation in total. But the beginning of the deco phase seems not to be perfect yet in Divinglog. I tested some dives without noticeable differences.
OSTC:
[img]file.php?2,file=525,filename=ostc.PNG[/img]
Divinglog:
[img]file.php?2,file=524,filename=divinglog.PNG[/img]
Regards,
Matthias
Re: New deco calculator for Diving Log
Thank you Matthias, I noticed this also and think this is due to the GF implementation. I have a few questions which I would like to ask you via email.
Diving Log 6.0 - https://www.divinglog.de/
-
- Posts: 4446
- Joined: Sunday 13. May 2007, 18:07
Re: New deco calculator for Diving Log
divinglog Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Thank you Matthias, I noticed this also and think
> this is due to the GF implementation. I have a few
> questions which I would like to ask you via email.
Sure
-------------------------------------------------------
> Thank you Matthias, I noticed this also and think
> this is due to the GF implementation. I have a few
> questions which I would like to ask you via email.
Sure
