New Firmware and decompression model
Posted: Sunday 25. November 2012, 17:12
Hello everybody,
I am considering an OSTC N2 as my next dive computer and I was kind of surprised to see it is using Buhlmann or Buhlmann with gradient factors rather than moving to the newer models considering the gaseous phase in addition to the dissolved gasses.
So considering the proposal to move to the new 3.0 firmware (i saw a post a few days ago but it was mostly concentrating on user interface and custom values) I was thinking that implementing an additional decompression model (Variable permeability model with Boyle VPM-B or reduced Gradient bubble model) would really give an edge to the OSTC N2 on the rest of the crowd
-D.
It would be the only computer having the choice between classic algoritms and up to date with research decompression model. It is also to be noticed that in a standard dive (no multilevel) Buhlmann with GF set at 30% 85% is very close to VPM-B with consevativism set at +2 in V-Planner (which uses VPM-B ). Liquivision X1 for example uses VPM-B (V-planner live implementation) as decompression model.
The main disadvantage in using Buhlmann vs VPM-B is we miss considering oxygen window effect (multigas environment) and effect on bubble formation and dissolution of yo-yo dives.
Any toughts on moving on bubble models and on the opportunity of only staying on a classic decompression model?
Thanks
Fabio
I am considering an OSTC N2 as my next dive computer and I was kind of surprised to see it is using Buhlmann or Buhlmann with gradient factors rather than moving to the newer models considering the gaseous phase in addition to the dissolved gasses.
So considering the proposal to move to the new 3.0 firmware (i saw a post a few days ago but it was mostly concentrating on user interface and custom values) I was thinking that implementing an additional decompression model (Variable permeability model with Boyle VPM-B or reduced Gradient bubble model) would really give an edge to the OSTC N2 on the rest of the crowd

It would be the only computer having the choice between classic algoritms and up to date with research decompression model. It is also to be noticed that in a standard dive (no multilevel) Buhlmann with GF set at 30% 85% is very close to VPM-B with consevativism set at +2 in V-Planner (which uses VPM-B ). Liquivision X1 for example uses VPM-B (V-planner live implementation) as decompression model.
The main disadvantage in using Buhlmann vs VPM-B is we miss considering oxygen window effect (multigas environment) and effect on bubble formation and dissolution of yo-yo dives.
Any toughts on moving on bubble models and on the opportunity of only staying on a classic decompression model?
Thanks
Fabio