Hi
Got my OSTC yesterday, going to be diving it in CCR mode this weekend.
Is ZH-L16 CC the same as L16-GF CC with 100/100 GFs ?
Or does the ZH-L16 algorithm already assume some GFs to naked Buhlmann, and the L16-GF algorithm just allows user settings ?
If so, what are the assumed GFs ?
Ar cienu
TB.
(ps I would have thought 100/100 is mega-aggressive for any serious dive)
ZH-L16 vs L16-GF
Re: ZH-L16 vs L16-GF
Hello,
In short: NO.
Both are derived from the > Bühlmann model:
* ZHL-16 (CC or OCR) uses asymetric saturation/desaturation security factors.
* ZHL-16-GF (CC or OCR) uses GF security factors.
Hope this helps.
In short: NO.
Both are derived from the > Bühlmann model:
* ZHL-16 (CC or OCR) uses asymetric saturation/desaturation security factors.
* ZHL-16-GF (CC or OCR) uses GF security factors.
Hope this helps.
~~~~
JeanDo, http://ostc-planner.net, OSTC Mk.2 1455, 2N 2799, DR5 171.
JeanDo, http://ostc-planner.net, OSTC Mk.2 1455, 2N 2799, DR5 171.
Re: ZH-L16 vs L16-GF
JeanDo
Thanks - that does help very much.
Any idea where I can find more about the asymetric saturation/desaturation security factors ?
Many thanks
Ar cienu
Baron.
Thanks - that does help very much.
Any idea where I can find more about the asymetric saturation/desaturation security factors ?
Many thanks
Ar cienu
Baron.
-
- Posts: 4469
- Joined: 13 May 2007, 18:07
Re: ZH-L16 vs L16-GF
Check this link for an introduction of the model: http://www.achim-und-kai.de/kai/tausim/ ... _e.html#k3
regards,
Matthias
regards,
Matthias