ZH-L16 vs L16-GF

Legacy OSTC's
Post Reply
Baron015
Posts: 2
Joined: 06 Jul 2011, 15:00

ZH-L16 vs L16-GF

Post by Baron015 »

Hi

Got my OSTC yesterday, going to be diving it in CCR mode this weekend.

Is ZH-L16 CC the same as L16-GF CC with 100/100 GFs ?

Or does the ZH-L16 algorithm already assume some GFs to naked Buhlmann, and the L16-GF algorithm just allows user settings ?

If so, what are the assumed GFs ?

Ar cienu
TB.

(ps I would have thought 100/100 is mega-aggressive for any serious dive)
JeanDo
Posts: 238
Joined: 06 Dec 2010, 15:43

Re: ZH-L16 vs L16-GF

Post by JeanDo »

Hello,

In short: NO.


Both are derived from the > Bühlmann model:
* ZHL-16 (CC or OCR) uses asymetric saturation/desaturation security factors.
* ZHL-16-GF (CC or OCR) uses GF security factors.

Hope this helps.
~~~~
JeanDo, http://ostc-planner.net, OSTC Mk.2 1455, 2N 2799, DR5 171.
Baron015
Posts: 2
Joined: 06 Jul 2011, 15:00

Re: ZH-L16 vs L16-GF

Post by Baron015 »

JeanDo

Thanks - that does help very much.

Any idea where I can find more about the asymetric saturation/desaturation security factors ?

Many thanks

Ar cienu
Baron.
heinrichsweikamp
Posts: 4469
Joined: 13 May 2007, 18:07

Re: ZH-L16 vs L16-GF

Post by heinrichsweikamp »

Check this link for an introduction of the model: http://www.achim-und-kai.de/kai/tausim/ ... _e.html#k3

regards,
Matthias
Post Reply